Skip to content

Weight

Weight (clinical table).

Name in the dataset weight
Type clinical
Stored in clinical_data.csv
Unit kg

Measurement space

-0.500.5true minus recorded (kg)1. recorded 59 kgdensity-0.0500.05true minus recorded (kg)2. recorded 53.4 kgdensity

Vertical slices through the measurement space: how the true value is spread around a recorded one, for 2 recorded values chosen to show the different cases. Each panel has its own scale. Each is averaged over every record with that value in the release, from the pinned model; groups of fewer than 20 records are not shown.

  1. 59 kg (the commonest recorded value; 32 records): mean +2.44e-05 kg, SD 0.149 kg, 95% between -0.406 and +0.402. Rounding: scale_0.1 60%, whole_kg 26%, scale_0.05 14%.
  2. 53.4 kg (the narrowest; 31 records): mean +6.61e-05 kg, SD 0.0271 kg, 95% between -0.0493 and +0.0447. Rounding: scale_0.1 84%, scale_0.05 16%.
Joint map of recorded against true value for Weight
Joint map: across, the recorded value; up, the true value minus the recorded one. Colour is the share of all probability in the release (6,388 records), on a log scale. Each column is a slice like those above; tall columns are values people round to, narrow ones values written as measured.

Time

This variable carries no time of its own in the dataset.

Value

Model kind model: fitted rounding model (value kind); posterior over the true value
Resolution heaped: a mixture of rounding modes (see the value model)
Status measured
Studies Rounding and heaping of weight

In this release

How wide the true-value distribution is, record by record, over 6,388 of 6,388 records (all clinical rows) that have one. Computed with the pinned model, aggregates only.

Median p10 to p90
Standard deviation 0.0266 kg 0.0144 to 0.147 kg
95% interval width 0.0937 kg 0.0475 to 0.801 kg
Mean minus recorded -6.96e-06 kg -9.83e-05 to 0.000129 kg

Value model

Model file: …/models/weight.model.json. Read from the pinned snapshot of vitaldb-resolution at commit bb03ddfc8a (2026-10-18).

How a true value becomes the recorded one. The rules are tried in order: a record not taken by an earlier rule is taken by this one with the probability shown (where its condition holds); the last rule takes the rest. Shares of all records depend on the conditions and the true value, so the model must be evaluated for them; the probabilities below are the fitted ones.

Order Rule Rounds to Probability if reached Applies when
1 whole_kg 1 kg (nearest) 2.9 % always
2 scale_0.1 0.1 kg (nearest) 66.0 % varies with department
3 scale_0.05 0.05 kg (nearest) the rest always
Recorded resolution 0.05
True-value density log_student_t_regression
Covariates sex, age, department
Fitted on 6,041 records (clinical_data.csv)
BIC 77,930
Fitted 2026-10-13
  • Two scale resolutions are present (0.05 and 0.1 kg); modelled as modes rather than overridden.
  • Measurement variability (beyond rounding): SD 0.5% of the value; for written-in values, SD 2.7 kg (from literature, not fitted).

Sources the model cites:

  • Khosla T, Billewicz WZ. Measurement of change in body-weight. Br J Nutr. 1964;18(1):227-239. doi:10.1079/BJN19640022
  • Vivanti A, Yu L, Palmer M, Dakin L, Sun J, Campbell K. Short-term body weight fluctuations in older well-hydrated hospitalised patients. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2013;26(5):429-435. doi:10.1111/jhn.12034
  • Ko Y, Choi S, Won J, Lee YK, Kim DH, Lee SK. Differences in accuracy of height, weight, and body mass index between self-reported and measured using the 2018 Korea Community Health Survey data. Epidemiol Health. 2022;44:e2022024. doi:10.4178/epih.e2022024

Studies

Study Date Status Summary
Rounding and heaping of weight 2026-10-13 current Recorded weight is a mixture of 3 rounding modes (whole_kg, scale_0.1, scale_0.05); the model gives the true value's distribution for each record.

Worked examples

Example Side Status Summary
A regression that carries rounding uncertainty through value draft Acute kidney injury after surgery against intraoperative urine output (mL/kg/h), fitted once on the recorded numbers and once per draw from the true-value distributions: the rounding moves 14% of cases across the oliguria threshold, but widens the confidence interval of the cohort's regression by at most 4%.
Charted propofol dose against the infusion pump value planned The charted propofol bolus total against the volume the Orchestra pump records, as a check of the propofol heaping model and as a dose in mg/kg with its uncertainty.
Oliguria labels for a prediction model value draft One label per patient, oliguric or not, from three rounded numbers: 10% of labels are uncertain and 2.6% are expected to be wrong, which sets a floor under the error any model can be measured to have. A typical model is barely affected; a good one is.
Urine output in mL/kg/h as a distribution value draft Intraoperative urine output per kilogram per hour, from three rounded inputs, as a probability distribution per case: one case in ten cannot be placed confidently on either side of 0.5 mL/kg/h.

Figures

Histogram of the recorded values of weight.
Recorded values in the release: 6,388 records, median 60.5 kg; 63 outside the 0.5–99.5th percentiles are not shown.

Tags: generated, vitaldb-resolution