Numeric delays are fixed within a case, different between cases¶
With each numeric's algorithm held fixed, delays were fitted for every case and every 30-minute block. They do not drift within a case, but 40–70% of their variance lies between cases, so a single population delay is wrong by up to 2 s for HR and 1 s for the others. Each case gets its own delay label.
900 random cases with SNUADC and Solar8000, then 6,387 of 6,388 cases (one file too large for the analysis machine); Primus ETCO₂ and PIP refitted in all 6,199 Primus cases on 13 October.
The pilot's consensus algorithm for each track; the delay fitted per case and per 30-minute block with the same
uniform-phase likelihood; variance split by a one-way random-effects model on the block delays (between-case SD,
within-case SD, intraclass correlation); case delays compared with set-up variables and across tracks.
The first Primus fit gave ETCO₂ a delay of −1.5 s, which the availability rule forbids: the hold until the
next breath had been counted twice. Refitted with a one-record phase, every median delay is positive.
One delay per case is enough; per-record labels are not needed. Per-case labels (numeric_delay) carry the delay,
its standard error (median 0.15–0.29 s, 1.0 s for RR) and a quality flag; 607 per-case delays that still come out
below zero are flagged weak. The population distribution is the prior where a case cannot be fitted.
Every monitor numeric describes a window of 3–30 s or more that ended 1–9 s before its stamp. None is stamped before its data exist, so the stamps already respect the availability rule.
A numeric's delay does not drift through a recording, but 40–70% of its variance lies between cases. One delay per case describes it; one delay for the whole dataset is wrong by up to about 2 s.
Minutes with MAP below 65 mmHg in 3,476 recordings, from the monitor's numeric and from the arterial waveform's beats: the two routes to one pressure differ by several mmHg per patient, which moves half of all patients' minutes by 5 or more and a fifth of their labels, and the numeric's averaging hides short dips in every patient.